News

Geopolitical Scenarios

Mappamondo, scenari, geopolitici
GEOPOLITICS

Geopolitical Scenarios

The day of 7 July 2026 presents a global geopolitical picture crossed by three converging crisis epicentres: the escalation in the Strait of Hormuz, following the revocation of the US oil waiver towards Iran; the NATO Summit in Ankara, which consecrates Turkey as a pivotal power of the Atlantic Alliance; and the continuation of the Russo-Ukrainian war, with the fortified belt of the Donbas under increasing pressure. To complete the scenario, the diplomacy of Khamenei’s funeral and signs of Chinese rearmament in the Pacific confirm a multipolar competition that is becoming increasingly and markedly maritime.

Key Events

Russia and the War in Ukraine The Ukrainian front registers a dual alarm. The city of Konstantynivka, the first bastion of the Donbas “fortress belt”, is wavering under pressure from Russian forces, raising the risk of a domino effect towards Druzhkivka, Sloviansk and Kramatorsk. Simultaneously, on the eve of the NATO summit, Moscow has intensified missile attacks against Kyiv, severely testing an air defence worn down by a chronic shortage of Patriot and IRIS-T interceptor missiles, in what analysts read as a psychological pressure signal on Western allies. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy continues to outline a rigorous strategy focused on boosting the country’s military ambitions and demanding structured, long-term Western support. Anastasiia Berezovska, the Ukrainian woman actively sought by international authorities as she is suspected of being the perpetrator of a serious terrorist attack in the Principality of Monaco, has been found dead. The affair raises serious questions regarding the dense network of cover-ups, the real motivations behind the attack on European territory, and the involvement of Ukrainian intelligence apparatuses in the event.
In recent months, Ukrainian attacks against Russian refineries, energy infrastructure and transport hubs have brought the conflict directly inside Russia, causing flight delays, airport closures and fuel shortages. Multiple methodological studies show a progressive increase in public support for the end of hostilities. Diplomatic relations between Kyiv and Warsaw face a phase of worrying coldness following the total failure of negotiations for the transfer of Soviet-made MiG-29 fighters to the Ukrainian air force and for the coordination of joint actions against Russian drones. (Jamestown Foundation; Notizie Geopolitiche; Il Sussidiario; Center for Strategic and International Studies; The National Interest)

The Near East and the Strait of Hormuz Following the third attack in just a few days against transiting tankers, which culminated in severe damage to the LNG carrier Al Rekayyat and damage to a Qatari LNG vessel, Washington has revoked the waiver on oil sanctions against Iran and launched new raids against pro-Iranian radar positions and drone depots. The crisis, which involves approximately 20% of the world’s oil and LNG, threatens the European minesweeping mission and pushes Turkey to propose itself as a logistical alternative through the “Middle Corridor”. In Damascus, a bomb attack during Emmanuel Macron’s visit struck near the hotel of the French delegation, undermining fragile attempts at Syrian political normalisation. (gCaptain; Responsible Statecraft; Notizie Geopolitiche)

NATO Summit in Ankara The Atlantic summit sanctions the birth of the “NATO 3.0” doctrine in a climate defined by ISPI as “vitriolic”: Donald Trump harshly criticised the European Union on the sharing of the defence burden, while reserving praise, albeit with reservations on the Iranian issue, for Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni. Turkey, the host country, emerges from it consecrated as an indispensable industrial hub for drones and shipbuilding, while Secretary General Rutte highlights its role in the Alliance’s technological base, within a framework of fragile internal cohesion.
The choice of Ankara as the venue for the summit underscores the transcontinental country’s essential geopolitical role on the southern flank of the Atlantic Alliance. Discussions focus on the delicate balance between Turkey’s Atlantic loyalty and its historic ambitions for strategic autonomy and regional mediation. Alliance leaders confront the need to accelerate military industrial production rates to cope with new high-intensity conflict scenarios. Emphasis is placed on overcoming fragmentation in European defence markets and promoting joint procurement. (RUSI; ISPI Online; Formiche.net; InsideOver)

China: Nuclear Deterrence in the Pacific and Military Purgings Beijing has carried out the successful launch of a ballistic missile from a nuclear submarine in Pacific waters, an explicit signal of deterrence aimed at Washington and its regional allies. The episode intertwines with the new wave of purges at the top of the PLA desired by Xi Jinping, which has hit another six generals for corruption and political disloyalty, highlighting both Chinese strategic ambition and the persistent internal vulnerabilities of the military apparatus. (Notizie Geopolitiche; The Jamestown Foundation)

Funeral Diplomacy and Middle Eastern Instability The funeral of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei was planned down to the smallest detail, not only to honour the country’s highest authority but to project a precise geopolitical message. Tehran wants to demonstrate that the Islamic Republic has successfully navigated a historic transition and that the succession in favour of the new Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei, has taken place smoothly, preserving the integrity of the institutions despite strong external pressures.
The participation of delegations from neighbouring countries and over seventy delegations, including Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Qatar and Oman, alongside giants such as China, Russia and India—contrasting with the total absence of Western governments—has been read as a severe blow to the strategy of Iranian isolation pursued by Trump and as certification of the substantial failure of the Abraham Accords. (Notizie Geopolitiche; ISPI Online)

Amphibious Partnership between the United Kingdom and the Netherlands London and The Hague signed, on the sidelines of the Ankara summit, a £2.4 billion agreement for the construction of eight next-generation amphibious transport ships based on a Dutch design, equipped with flight decks optimised for long-range drones. The deal, signed by Prime Ministers Starmer and Jetten, strengthens the projection capability of the Royal Navy and the Royal Netherlands Navy and explicitly aims to protect critical underwater infrastructure in the North Atlantic. (Naval News; gCaptain)

US Navy: Ballistic Submarine Vulnerabilities The US Navy has made public an unprecedented concern: Ohio-class nuclear boats and the future Columbia-class could prove vulnerable, during coastal transit, to asymmetric attacks conducted with modified commercial drones and anti-tank rockets launched from civilian vessels. The discovery forces a revision of operational protocols, whilst the US Navy has nonetheless achieved its 2026 recruitment target ahead of schedule. (Navy Times; USNI News)

Consequences of the Events

Geopolitical Consequences
The framework that emerged from 7 July confirms a progressive realignment of multipolar balances. The Ankara summit, rather than strengthening Atlantic cohesion, exposed its fractures: Trump’s critical rhetoric towards the European Union, balanced by a selective openness towards individual partners like Italy, outlines an increasingly transactional NATO, where bilateral loyalty prevails over collective solidarity. Turkey emerges from the summit as the main political beneficiary, capable of capitalising on its position as a hinge between the West, Russia and the Middle East, and of proposing itself as an alternative logistical backbone to Hormuz through the Middle Corridor (a multimodal logistical and commercial infrastructure network connecting China and East Asia to Europe, with Turkey as its promoter and central geographical hub uniting rail, road and sea routes, offering Ankara a leading role in Eurasian connectivity).
On the Middle Eastern front, Saudi participation in Khamenei’s funeral certifies a pragmatic rapprochement between Riyadh and Tehran that scales back the framework of the Abraham Accords and the strategy of Iranian isolation sought by Washington, opening up regional recomposition scenarios that partially exclude Israel and the United States from the Middle Eastern negotiating table.
In the Far East, Chinese military purges and the renamed USPACOM signal a US doctrinal transition towards a geographically more circumscribed deterrence, centered on the first island chain and the growing strategic weight of the Philippines at the expense of India. In Eastern Europe, Russian pressure on Konstantynivka and missile attacks on Kyiv, timed for the eve of the NATO summit, confirm the use of military leverage as a tool of political communication towards the Alliance, in an attempt to erode Western determination precisely at the moment of maximum Atlantic media exposure.

Strategic Consequences
The “NATO 3.0” doctrine emerged from Ankara redefines the Alliance’s posture towards multi-domain deterrence, capable of responding not only to conventional threats but also to hybrid tactics, cyber attacks, and vulnerabilities of underwater and space infrastructure. However, the fragility of internal cohesion, denounced by both RUSI and Chatham House, dictates caution: the credibility of the new doctrine will depend on the ability of individual member countries to translate declared commitments into concrete operational capabilities, as demonstrated by the scepticism accompanying the British defence investment plan.
On the nuclear deterrence front, the Chinese missile launch from the underwater platform in the Pacific strengthens the submarine component of Beijing’s triad, forcing Washington to review its ocean surveillance and patrolling plans. Parallelly, the revelation of the vulnerabilities of US SSBN submarines to asymmetric attacks with commercial drones and anti-tank rockets introduces a new risk factor for strategic stability, as it undermines the perceived security of the maritime component of American nuclear deterrence just as China consolidates its own.
Finally, the US doctrinal downsizing, from the broad concept of the “Indo-Pacific” to the more circumscribed “first island chain”, signals a rethinking of Washington’s geographical priorities, with the Philippines assuming a relatively more central role than India in containing Chinese maritime projection—a shift that European allies observe closely for its implications on resource allocation between theatres.

Economic, Technological, Financial, and Energy Consequences
The most immediate economic impact derives from the Hormuz crisis: the revocation of the oil waiver to Iran and the series of attacks on tankers have sharply raised war risk insurance premiums and prompted shipping companies to consider alternative routes, with direct effects on global energy prices. Japan, heavily dependent on Gulf supplies, forecasts a rebound in imports in July thanks to the release of previously blocked ships, but maintains a high state of alert.
On the financial front, the IARI analysis on the FATF “grey list” (the official list of countries subject to increased monitoring due to strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering and terrorist financing) reiterates how decisions on financial transparency represent a powerful tool of geopolitical pressure, capable of conditioning foreign direct investment and transaction costs for the economies involved. The possible intervention of the International Monetary Fund in the reconstruction of Venezuela also opens a macro-economic stabilisation front for Latin America, conditional on structural reforms and political guarantees.
On the energy-infrastructure side, the new reduction in maximum draught in the Panama Canal, imposed by the drought linked to the El Niño phenomenon, risks further penalising trade routes between Asia and the US East Coast, adding another global logistical bottleneck. On the technological front, the analysis of the smartphone as a “battlefield” and that of smart grids confirm that infrastructural and cyber competition is now an integral part of nations’ economic security. In Latin America and Africa, Eni’s agreements in Libia and Argentina strengthen the Italian strategy of energy diversification.

Maritime Consequences
The maritime sector is the area most directly affected by the events of 7 July. The Hormuz crisis, with three attacks on tankers in a few days and the risk of explosion of the gas carrier Al Rekayyat, highlights the structural vulnerability of commercial shipping in contested waters and puts pressure on the European minesweeping mission, which risks slowdowns or disengagements by some participating nations. Concurrently, the intensification of Ukrainian attacks against the Russian “ghost fleet” in the Black Sea and the Baltic, conducted with marine drones and long-range missiles, extends the war of attrition to civilian commercial routes, raising fears of large-scale environmental disasters.
In terms of shipbuilding and naval procurement, the picture of 7 July is particularly dense: in addition to the £2.4 billion Anglo-Dutch agreement for eight amphibious ships, notable events include the Philippine acquisition of five Japanese Abukuma-class escort destroyers, Canada’s selection of Thyssenkrupp Marine Systems for the CPSP submarine programme (up to twelve Type 212CD units), and the joint purchase by Denmark, Finland, Germany and Norway of MQ-4C Triton HALE drones to supplement the already operational fleet. The US Navy, for its part, is increasing the production of Lionfish underwater drones with HII, confirming the growing centrality of autonomous underwater systems in mine countermeasure and surveillance missions.
No less relevant is the discovery of the vulnerabilities of US ballistic submarines to asymmetric attacks during coastal transit, which imposes a revision of port security protocols on a global scale. Finally, the new draught restriction in the Panama Canal adds another factor of instability for world maritime logistics chains, in a context already marked by the Hormuz crisis and the persistent Houthi threat in the Red Sea.

Consequences for the Southern European Mediterranean countries
For Southern Mediterranean Europe, the day of 7 July presents direct and differentiated implications. Italy confirms its role as a diplomatic protagonist with the choice of Rome as the venue for negotiations between Israel and Lebanon along the Blue Line: a role that consolidates Italian prestige in the Wider Mediterranean, in continuity with its historic commitment to the UNIFIL mission, but which exposes Rome to the risk of asymmetric retaliation in the event of negotiation failure. On the energy plane, Eni’s agreements in Libya (the Sabratha offshore project, worth approximately ten billion euros) strengthen national supply security via the GreenStream pipeline, while the integration of the NATO Triton fleet from Sigonella confirms the centrality of the Sicilian base in allied maritime surveillance.
For Greece, the Turkish rise certified by the Ankara summit and the “Middle Corridor” project as an alternative to Hormuz represent a factor of strategic attention: Athens, historically sensitive to the dynamics of Turkish projection in the Aegean and the Eastern Mediterranean, will have to monitor the evolution of relations between Ankara and Atlantic partners, especially in light of the Turkish military-industrial strengthening recognized by Secretary General Rutte himself. The Hormuz crisis, moreover, indirectly affects energy routes towards the Eastern Mediterranean and the security of Hellenic supplies.
For Spain, the combination of instability in the Strait of Hormuz, pressure on the European minesweeping mission, and new logistical restrictions in Panama prompts a reflection on the resilience of Atlantic and Mediterranean trade routes, while the strengthening of industrial defence cooperation discussed in Ankara offers Madrid margins for participation in multinational naval and aircraft procurement programmes. Overall, the three countries share an increasing exposure to Middle Eastern energy volatility and the evolution of Turkey’s posture in the Wider Mediterranean.

Conclusions

The summary of 7 July 2026 reflects an international system undergoing simultaneous recalibration on multiple axes: the Atlantic one, tested by the “NATO 3.0” doctrine and transatlantic frictions emerged in Ankara; the Middle Eastern one, where the Hormuz crisis and the diplomacy of Khamenei’s funeral redraw regional alignments; and the Indo-Pacific one, where Chinese nuclear deterrence and the US doctrinal shift towards the first island chain prelude to a long-term competition.
Among the topics susceptible to further developments in the coming days, priority should be given to:

  • Firstly, the evolution of the Hormuz crisis, the outcome of which will directly affect global energy markets and the stability of the European minesweeping mission;
  • Secondly, the resilience of the Konstantynivka front, whose eventual collapse would open a critical phase for the entire fortified belt of the Donbas;
  • Thirdly, the developments of post-Ankara NATO cohesion, with particular attention to the materialisation of the British investment plan and the issue of F-35s to Turkey.
  • Finally, the evolution of the Israeli-Lebanese negotiation hosted in Rome deserves attention, serving as a test bed for Italian diplomatic capacity in the Wider Mediterranean.

A priority monitoring of these four dossiers is therefore recommended in upcoming bulletins, maintaining particular attention to the maritime and energy repercussions for the Mediterranean area.

References This summary has been prepared based on articles from various geopolitical and strategic analysis sources, including: Center for Maritime Strategy, CIMSEC, Reuters, ShipMag, Navy Lookout, National Interest, Seapower Magazine, CSIS, RUSI, War on the Rocks, IISS, Responsible Statecraft, Foreign Affairs, Formiche.net, Il Sussidiario, Start Magazine, InsideOver, Notizie Geopolitiche, IARI, Dissipatio, Analisi Difesa, Jamestown Foundation, Atlantic Council, RAND Corporation.


THE CONTRIBUTIONS ARE THE DIRECT RESPONSIBILITY OF THE EDITORIAL STAFF AND REFLECT THEIR VIEWS.

TOTAL OR PARTIAL REPRODUCTION IS AUTHORIZED PROVIDED THAT THE SOURCE IS CITED. THE STRUCTURING AND INTERPRETATION OF THE DATA ARE THE RESULT OF A SYNTHESIS PROCESS AIMED AT CREATING A COHERENT AND ORGANIC ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK. THE SUMMARY DOES NOT REPRESENT AN ORIGINAL ANALYSIS, BUT RATHER A STRUCTURED REORGANIZATION OF THE INFORMATION COLLECTED AND SELECTED BASED ON THE EXPERTISE OF OUR SCHOLARS, WHO THEN EXTRAPOLATED THE CONSEQUENCES IN THE GEOPOLITICAL, STRATEGIC, MARITIME, AND ITALYRELATED FIELDS.